Turner v. Caudill

Supreme Court of Georgia

Turner v. Caudill

165 S.E. 24, 175 Ga. 170, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 216

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 16, 1932·No. No. 8711·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It does not appear from the petition that the defendant had sought to avail himself of the constitutional provision which exempts $300 worth of household and kitchen furniture and provisions from levy and sale, gind which can not be waived, by proceeding to have this property set apart in accordance with the provisions of the act of 1924. Ga. L. 1924, p. 57; Code, § 6584. Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It does not appear from the petition that the defendant had sought to avail himself of the constitutional provision which exempts $300 worth of household and kitchen furniture and provisions from levy and sale, gind which can not be waived, by proceeding to have this property set apart in accordance with the provisions of the act of 1924. Ga. L. 1924, p. 57; Code, § 6584. Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Turner v. Caudill, 165 S.E. 24, 175 Ga. 170, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 216 (Ga. 1932).

Pincite

165 S.E. 24 (Turner v. Caudill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.