Turner v. Burks
This text of 2025 Ohio 1225 (Turner v. Burks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as Turner v. Burks, 2025-Ohio-1225.]
COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
JOLENE M. ENGELS TURNER, : JUDGES: : Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, P.J. First Petitioner- Appellee : Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. : Hon. David M. Gormley, J. -vs- : : JORDAN A. BURKS, : Case No. 2024 CA 00099 : Second Petitioner - Appellant : OPINION
CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Appeal from the Licking County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, Case No. 2024 DR 00188 DP
JUDGMENT: Dismissed
DATE OF JUDGMENT: April 3, 2025
APPEARANCES: For Second Petitioner-Appellant For First Petitioner-Appellee
JORDAN A. BURKS, Pro Se No Appearance 525 Eric Drive Newark, Ohio 43055
For Licking County CSEA
CAROLYN J. CARNES Assistant Prosecuting Attorney 65 E. Main Street Newark, Ohio 43055 Baldwin, P.J.
{¶1} The appellant, Jordan A. Burks, appeals the December 4, 2024, Judgment
Entry of the Licking County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division.
ANALYSIS
{¶2} App.R. 16 states, in pertinent part:
(A) Brief of the Appellant. The appellant shall include in its brief, under
the headings and in the order indicated all of the following:
***
(3) A statement of the assignments of error presented for review, with
reference to the place in the record where each error is reflected.
(5) A statement of the case briefly describing the nature of the case, the
course of proceedings, and the disposition in the court below.
(6) A statement of facts relevant to the assignments of error presented for
review, with appropriate references to the record in accordance with division
(D) of this rule.
(7) An argument containing the contentions of the appellant with respect to
each assignment of error presented for review and the reasons in support
of the contentions, with citations to the authorities, statutes, and parts of the
record on which appellant relies. The argument may be preceded by a
summary.
*** (D) References in Briefs to the Record. Reference in the briefs to parts
of the record shall be to pages of the parts of the record involved[.]
{¶3} App.R. 18(C) states, in pertinent part,” (C) Consequence of Failure to File
Briefs. If an appellant fails to file the appellant’s brief within the time provided by this rule,
or within the time as extended, the court may dismiss the appeal.”
{¶4} The appellant has filed a brief on his own behalf. Unfortunately, the
appellant’s presentation of his argument is disjointed, extremely difficult to follow, and
does not conform with the requirements of App.R.16. As the appellant’s brief is non-
compliant in nearly every respect, we dismiss his appeal pursuant to App.R. 18(C).
By: Baldwin, P.J.
Hoffman, J. and
Gormley, J. concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 Ohio 1225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-burks-ohioctapp-2025.