Turner v. Burke Hosiery Mill
111 S.E.2d 185, 251 N.C. 325, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 557
Opinion
After a careful examination of the plaintiff’s assignments of error we are constrained to hold that -this ease falls within the purview of our decision in Hensley v. Cooperative, 246 N.C. 274, 98 S.E. 2d 289, and on authority of that case the judgment below is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Turner v. Burke Hosiery Mill, 111 S.E.2d 185, 251 N.C. 325, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 557 (N.C. 1959).
111 S.E.2d 185 (Turner v. Burke Hosiery Mill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Burrow v. Dunn Bradstreet
North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2007
Gaddy v. Cranston Print Works Co.
326 S.E.2d 331 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)
Russell v. Pharr Yarns, Inc.
196 S.E.2d 571 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1973)
Lawrence v. Hatch Mill
144 S.E.2d 3 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)
O'Mary v. Land Clearing Corporation
135 S.E.2d 193 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1964)
Pardue v. BLACKBURN BROTHERS OIL & TIRE COMPANY
132 S.E.2d 747 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Byrd v. Farmers Federation Cooperative
132 S.E.2d 348 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Keller v. ELECTRIC WIRING COMPANY
130 S.E.2d 342 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Harding v. THOMAS AND HOWARD COMPANY
124 S.E.2d 109 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
Searcy v. Branson
116 S.E.2d 175 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960)