Turner v. Bailey

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedDecember 31, 2024
DocketCivil Action No. 2024-3452
StatusPublished

This text of Turner v. Bailey (Turner v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turner v. Bailey, (D.D.C. 2024).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

DEON TURNER,

Petitioner,

v. Civil Action No. 24-cv-3452 (ABJ)

WILLIAM BAILEY,

Respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis

and pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner, who is serving a sentence imposed by

the Circuit Court of Maryland for Talbot County, currently is incarcerated at the Eastern

Correctional Institution in Westover, Maryland. Generally, petitioner challenges his conviction

and sentence, and demands immediate release from custody.

Federal court review of State court convictions is available under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 only

after the exhaustion of available State remedies. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1). Thereafter, “an

application for a writ of habeas corpus [ ] made by a person in custody under the judgment and

sentence of a State court . . . may be filed in the district court for the district wherein such person

is in custody or in the district court for the district within which the State court was held which

convicted and sentenced [petitioner] and each of such district courts shall have concurrent

jurisdiction to entertain the application.” 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Even if petitioner had exhausted

available remedies under State law, because he has been convicted and sentenced in Maryland,

this matter may not proceed in the District of Columbia.

1 For the foregoing reasons, the Court will grant the application to proceed in forma pauperis

and dismiss the habeas petition without prejudice. An Order is issued separately.

/s/ AMY BERMAN JACKSON United States District Judge DATE: December 31, 2024

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Turner v. Bailey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-bailey-dcd-2024.