Turner v. Austin
This text of 225 S.E.2d 20 (Turner v. Austin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jack Douglas Turner attacked the constitutionality of Code Ann. § 76-201 (Ga. L. 1962, pp. 121,122; 1974, pp. 322, 323) and alleged that he was required to execute a peace bond on September 13,1975, in order to be released from the custody of the respondent sheriff. The trial court granted the motion to dismiss the habeas corpus application for failure to state a claim. The appeal is from [608]*608this judgment. Held:
The respondent argues that the questions raised in this appeal are moot since the peace bond dated September 13,1975, was not returned to the next term of Barrow Superior Court which was in November 1975.
The appellant argues that the constitutionality of the statute should be decided under the decision of Parris v. State, 232 Ga. 687 (208 SE2d 493) (1974) and cits. We do not agree. The Parris case dealt with a purportedly void conviction and has no application to this case.
In Dukes v. Dukes, 119 Ga. App. 842, 843 (168 SE2d 902) (1969) it is said:".. .[I]t is essential to the validity of a peace bond... that the proceedings be returned to the next term of the superior court after the bond is given and that failure to make the return on time vitiates the obligation.” The question raised in this appeal is, therefore, moot.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 S.E.2d 20, 236 Ga. 607, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-austin-ga-1976.