Turner v. Appeal Administrative Process

55 F. App'x 677
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 10, 2003
DocketNo. 02-7812
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 55 F. App'x 677 (Turner v. Appeal Administrative Process) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turner v. Appeal Administrative Process, 55 F. App'x 677 (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Turner v. Appeal Admin. Process, Nos. CR-95-946; MISC-02-47 (W.D.Va. Nov. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. United States
538 U.S. 1068 (Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 F. App'x 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-appeal-administrative-process-ca4-2003.