Turner v. Appeal Administrative Process

Fourth Circuit

Turner v. Appeal Administrative Process

55 F. App'x 677

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 10, 2003·No. No. 02-7812·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Turner v. Appeal Admin. Process, Nos. CR-95-946; MISC-02-47 (W.D.Va. Nov. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Turner v. Appeal Admin. Process, Nos. CR-95-946; MISC-02-47 (W.D.Va. Nov. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Turner v. Appeal Administrative Process, 55 F. App'x 677 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

55 F. App'x 677 (Turner v. Appeal Administrative Process) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related