Turner, Ronnie
This text of Turner, Ronnie (Turner, Ronnie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-63,583-28
EX PARTE RONNIE TURNER, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. C-3-W011403-0941085-O IN CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NUMBER THREE FROM TARRANT COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated
robbery and sentenced to forty-five years’ imprisonment. The Second Court of Appeals affirmed his
conviction. Turner v. State, No. 02-05-00427-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Oct. 5, 2006) (not
designated for publication).
Applicant contends, among other things, that he is actually innocent. This application,
however, presents a more serious question. According to this Court’s records, Applicant has filed 2
at least five previous applications that have been dismissed under Article 11.07, § 4 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure. It is obvious from the record that Applicant continues to raise issues that have
been presented and rejected in previous applications or that should have been presented in previous
applications. The writ of habeas corpus is not to be lightly or easily abused. Sanders v. U.S., 373 U.S.
1 (1963); Ex parte Carr, 511 S.W.2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). Because of his repetitive claims,
we hold that Applicant’s claims are barred from review under Article 11.07, § 4, and are waived and
abandoned by his abuse of the writ. This application is dismissed.
Therefore, we instruct the Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals not to accept any future
application pertaining to this conviction unless Applicant is able to show in such an application that
any claims presented have not been raised previously and that they could not have been presented
in a previous application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Bilton, 602 S.W.2d 534 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1980).
Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional
Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
Filed: September 11, 2019 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Turner, Ronnie, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-ronnie-texcrimapp-2019.