Turner Mercantile Co. v. Merchants' & Planters' State Bank of Winnsboro

Court of Appeals of Texas

Turner Mercantile Co. v. Merchants' & Planters' State Bank of Winnsboro

293 S.W. 1119, 1927 Tex. App. LEXIS 210

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 14, 1927

DocketNo. 3369.

StatusPublished

This text of 293 S.W. 1119 (Turner Mercantile Co. v. Merchants' & Planters' State Bank of Winnsboro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turner Mercantile Co. v. Merchants' & Planters' State Bank of Winnsboro, 293 S.W. 1119, 1927 Tex. App. LEXIS 210 (Tex. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

HODGES, J.

The Merchants’ & Planters State Bank of Winnsboro, plaintiff below, sued the appellant, Turner, on a note for $630.62, together with interest and attorney’s fees. Turner answered by a general denial and pleaded offsets and payments amounting to the sum of $342.47. -He also pleaded that the bank was not the owner of the note. In a trial before the court without a jury, some of the offsets pleaded by Turner were allowed, and a judgment rendered in favor of the bank for the remainder. There is no statement of facts in the record, and no findings of fact and conclusions of law were filed by the trial court. In his first assignment the appellant complains of the refusal of the court to file findings of fact and conclusions of law, but the record contains no bill of exceptions, and that assignment must be overruled. Kennedy v. Kennedy (Tex. Civ. App.) 210 S. W. 581; Hoffman v. Korp & Murray Tool Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 251 S. W. 823. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HODGES, J.

The Merchants’ & Planters State Bank of Winnsboro, plaintiff below, sued the appellant, Turner, on a note for $630.62, together with interest and attorney’s fees. Turner answered by a general denial and pleaded offsets and payments amounting to the sum of $342.47. -He also pleaded that the bank was not the owner of the note. In a trial before the court without a jury, some of the offsets pleaded by Turner were allowed, and a judgment rendered in favor of the bank for the remainder. There is no statement of facts in the record, and no findings of fact and conclusions of law were filed by the trial court. In his first assignment the appellant complains of the refusal of the court to file findings of fact and conclusions of law, but the record contains no bill of exceptions, and that assignment must be overruled. Kennedy v. Kennedy (Tex. Civ. App.) 210 S. W. 581; Hoffman v. Korp & Murray Tool Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 251 S. W. 823. The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 S.W. 1119, 1927 Tex. App. LEXIS 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-mercantile-co-v-merchants-planters-state-bank-of-winnsboro-texapp-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack