Turner-Gray v. Avis Budget Group Inc.

N.D. California

Turner-Gray v. Avis Budget Group Inc.

DecidedJuly 16, 2024

Docket3:23-cv-05507

StatusUnknown

This text of Turner-Gray v. Avis Budget Group Inc. (Turner-Gray v. Avis Budget Group Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turner-Gray v. Avis Budget Group Inc., (N.D. Cal. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AVIA TURNER-GRAY, Case No. 23-cv-05507-SI

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO FILE 9 v. AMENDED COMPLAINT; AMENDED COMPLAINT TO BE FILED NO 10 AVIS BUDGET GROUP INC., LATER THAN JULY 24, 2024; VACATING JULY 19 CASE 11 Defendant. MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; SCHEDULING FURTHER CASE 12 MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR AUGUST 23, 2024 AT 3 PM 13 Re: Dkt. No. 31 14

15 16 Plaintiff Avia Turner-Gray’s motion to file an amended complaint is scheduled for a hearing 17 on July 19, 2024. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that the matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing. The motion is 18 GRANTED IN PART as set forth below. 19 Turner-Gray requests leave to file an amended complaint to re-add defendants AMN 20 Healthcare Interim Solutions, LLC and AMN Healthcare, Inc., and to assert several new causes of 21 action, including “recklessness” and malicious prosecution. Avis objects to the addition of these 22 causes of action on several grounds. Turner-Gray did not file a reply to Avis’s opposition. 23 The Court concludes that under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), Turner-Gray 24 should be given leave to file the amended complaint. However, the Court agrees with Avis that 25 recklessness describes a state of mind and is not an independent cause of action under California 26 law. See Delaney v. Baker, 20 Cal. 4th 23, 31 (1999) (discussing recklessness). As such, the 27 amended complaint shall not include a cause of action for recklessness. As to the cause of action 1 elements of such a claim, as Turner-Gray alleges that she obtained a finding of factual innocence 2 and that Avis’s conduct was malicious. Finally, the Court notes that the proposed amended 3 complaint does not make clear which causes of action are brought against which defendants. The 4 Court directs Turner-Gray to provide that clarification in the amended complaint. 5 Accordingly, the Court GRANTS plaintiffs motion and directs Turmer-Gray to file the

‘ amended complaint no later than July 24, 2024. The amended complaint shall not contain a cause of action for recklessness and shall state, for each cause of action, which defendants are named in 7 that cause of action. The Court schedules a case management conference for August 24, 2024 8 at 3 p.m. via zoom. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: July 16, 2024 13 SAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

= 17

Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AVIA TURNER-GRAY, Case No. 23-cv-05507-SI

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO FILE 9 v. AMENDED COMPLAINT; AMENDED COMPLAINT TO BE FILED NO 10 AVIS BUDGET GROUP INC., LATER THAN JULY 24, 2024; VACATING JULY 19 CASE 11 Defendant. MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; SCHEDULING FURTHER CASE 12 MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR AUGUST 23, 2024 AT 3 PM 13 Re: Dkt. No. 31 14

15 16 Plaintiff Avia Turner-Gray’s motion to file an amended complaint is scheduled for a hearing 17 on July 19, 2024. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that the matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing. The motion is 18 GRANTED IN PART as set forth below. 19 Turner-Gray requests leave to file an amended complaint to re-add defendants AMN 20 Healthcare Interim Solutions, LLC and AMN Healthcare, Inc., and to assert several new causes of 21 action, including “recklessness” and malicious prosecution. Avis objects to the addition of these 22 causes of action on several grounds. Turner-Gray did not file a reply to Avis’s opposition. 23 The Court concludes that under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), Turner-Gray 24 should be given leave to file the amended complaint. However, the Court agrees with Avis that 25 recklessness describes a state of mind and is not an independent cause of action under California 26 law. See Delaney v. Baker, 20 Cal. 4th 23, 31 (1999) (discussing recklessness). As such, the 27 amended complaint shall not include a cause of action for recklessness. As to the cause of action 1 elements of such a claim, as Turner-Gray alleges that she obtained a finding of factual innocence 2 and that Avis’s conduct was malicious. Finally, the Court notes that the proposed amended 3 complaint does not make clear which causes of action are brought against which defendants. The 4 Court directs Turner-Gray to provide that clarification in the amended complaint. 5 Accordingly, the Court GRANTS plaintiffs motion and directs Turmer-Gray to file the

‘ amended complaint no later than July 24, 2024. The amended complaint shall not contain a cause of action for recklessness and shall state, for each cause of action, which defendants are named in 7 that cause of action. The Court schedules a case management conference for August 24, 2024 8 at 3 p.m. via zoom. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: July 16, 2024 13 SAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

= 17

Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Turner-Gray v. Avis Budget Group Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-gray-v-avis-budget-group-inc-cand-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack