Turner & Blanchard, Inc. v. The S.S. Emilia & A. H. Bull Steamship Co.

Second Circuit

Turner & Blanchard, Inc. v. The S.S. Emilia & A. H. Bull Steamship Co.

322 F.2d 249

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJune 28, 1963

DocketNo. 411, Docket 28293

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 322 F.2d 249 (Turner & Blanchard, Inc. v. The S.S. Emilia & A. H. Bull Steamship Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turner & Blanchard, Inc. v. The S.S. Emilia & A. H. Bull Steamship Co., 322 F.2d 249 (2d Cir. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Order of May 21, 1963, insofar as appealed, affirmed. “Service rendered to the ship after arrest, in aid of the discharge of cargo, and afterward pending the sale, necessarily inured to their [lienors] benefit, for it contributed to the creation of the fund now available to them.” The district court had jurisdiction “to require that expenses which have contributed either to the preservation or creation of the fund in its custody shall be paid before a general distribution among those entitled to receive it.” New York Dock Co. v. The Poznan, 274 U.S. 117, 121, 47 S.Ct. 482, 484, 71 L.Ed. 955 (1927). The district court is requested to proceed with all reasonable and feasible dispatch. Mandate shall issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Order of May 21, 1963, insofar as appealed, affirmed. “Service rendered to the ship after arrest, in aid of the discharge of cargo, and afterward pending the sale, necessarily inured to their [lienors] benefit, for it contributed to the creation of the fund now available to them.” The district court had jurisdiction “to require that expenses which have contributed either to the preservation or creation of the fund in its custody shall be paid before a general distribution among those entitled to receive it.” New York Dock Co. v. The Poznan, 274 U.S. 117, 121, 47 S.Ct. 482, 484, 71 L.Ed. 955 (1927). The district court is requested to proceed with all reasonable and feasible dispatch. Mandate shall issue forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

322 F.2d 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-blanchard-inc-v-the-ss-emilia-a-h-bull-steamship-co-ca2-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack