Turner and Lewis v. Barker

146 So. 666, 108 Fla. 589
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 7, 1933·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected by the Court, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the said Circuit Court be, and the same is affirmed. See Malone v. Meyer, 91 Fla. 709, 109 So. 677.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turner and Lewis v. Barker, 146 So. 666, 108 Fla. 589 (Fla. 1933).

146 So. 666 (Turner and Lewis v. Barker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Malone v. Meres
109 So. 677 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)