Turnbull v. Mann

26 S.E. 510, 94 Va. 182, 1897 Va. LEXIS 59
CourtSupreme Court of Virginia
DecidedJanuary 7, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 26 S.E. 510 (Turnbull v. Mann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turnbull v. Mann, 26 S.E. 510, 94 Va. 182, 1897 Va. LEXIS 59 (Va. 1897).

Opinion

' Harrison, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

[183]*183The court is of opinion that the purpose of section 2198 of the Code was to afford a summary remedy for having the liens mentioned therein marked satisfied, where that duty has been neglected or for any cause has not been performed, upon proof that the debt has been actually paid or discharged, and was not intended to enable persons to have such liens marked satisfied because liable to be defeated by presumption of payment, or because barred by the statute of limitations.

The judgment of the lower court must, therefore, be reversed, and the motion dismissed without prejudice to the rights of either party thereto.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

General Electric Credit Corporation v. Lunsford
167 S.E.2d 414 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1969)
Wagner v. Peters
128 S.E. 445 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1925)
Turnbull v. Mann
37 S.E. 288 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 S.E. 510, 94 Va. 182, 1897 Va. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turnbull-v-mann-va-1897.