Turnbull v. Bonkowski

D. Alaska

Turnbull v. Bonkowski

274 F. Supp. 733, 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8149

CourtDistrict Court, D. Alaska

DecidedOctober 25, 1967

DocketNo. F-20-66

StatusPublished

This text of 274 F. Supp. 733 (Turnbull v. Bonkowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Alaska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turnbull v. Bonkowski, 274 F. Supp. 733, 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8149 (D. Alaska 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VON DER HEYDT, District Judge.

Plaintiff was injured during his minority. He brought this action for personal injuries on January 25, 1966, his twenty-first birthday. Defendants have moved for summary judgment, claiming that the action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations, which provides in part that:

No person may bring an action * * for any injury to the person * * * unless commenced within two years.¹

The statute was tolled during plaintiff’s minority, i. e., until he was nineteen years of age.² Computation of the applicable limitations period subsequent to the removal of the disability is to be made by excluding the first day and including the last.³ As noted by plaintiff, this statutory computation is declaratory of the common law rule in Alaska.⁴

However, there exists a well recognized exception in the common law [734]*734as to the computation of a person’s age. This exception, briefly stated, is that “[a] year must be counted, not from the day of birth, but from the preceding day when limitation is figured.” ⁵ Since the statute is declaratory of the common law rule, and not in derogation thereof, the exception pertains.⁶ Consequently, the disability of plaintiff was removed on January 24, 1964, the day prior to plaintiff’s nineteenth birthday. The limitation period thus expired on January 24, 1966, the day before the case was filed.⁷

Since suit was not commenced within the applicable statute of limitations period, the motion for summary judgment is granted. Defendants’ counsel may prepare an appropriate form of .judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VON DER HEYDT, District Judge.

Plaintiff was injured during his minority. He brought this action for personal injuries on January 25, 1966, his twenty-first birthday. Defendants have moved for summary judgment, claiming that the action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations, which provides in part that:

No person may bring an action * * for any injury to the person * * * unless commenced within two years.¹

The statute was tolled during plaintiff’s minority, i. e., until he was nineteen years of age.² Computation of the applicable limitations period subsequent to the removal of the disability is to be made by excluding the first day and including the last.³ As noted by plaintiff, this statutory computation is declaratory of the common law rule in Alaska.⁴

However, there exists a well recognized exception in the common law [734]*734as to the computation of a person’s age. This exception, briefly stated, is that “[a] year must be counted, not from the day of birth, but from the preceding day when limitation is figured.” ⁵ Since the statute is declaratory of the common law rule, and not in derogation thereof, the exception pertains.⁶ Consequently, the disability of plaintiff was removed on January 24, 1964, the day prior to plaintiff’s nineteenth birthday. The limitation period thus expired on January 24, 1966, the day before the case was filed.⁷

Since suit was not commenced within the applicable statute of limitations period, the motion for summary judgment is granted. Defendants’ counsel may prepare an appropriate form of .judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

274 F. Supp. 733, 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turnbull-v-bonkowski-akd-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack