Turnage v. United States Parole Commission

Fourth Circuit

Turnage v. United States Parole Commission

583 F. App'x 245

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 26, 2014·No. No. 14-6722·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tony Efrem Turnage, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Turnage v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, No. 1:11-cv-03373-ELH, 2014 WL 1340071 (D.Md. Apr. 2, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tony Efrem Turnage, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Turnage v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, No. 1:11-cv-03373-ELH, 2014 WL 1340071 (D.Md. Apr. 2, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Turnage v. United States Parole Commission, 583 F. App'x 245 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

583 F. App'x 245 (Turnage v. United States Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related