Turnage v. Lacorte
This text of 512 F. App'x 360 (Turnage v. Lacorte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Tony Turnage appeals the district court’s orders dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006) his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Turnage v. LaCorte, No. 1:12-cv-02214-ELH, 2012 WL 3263895 (D.Md. Aug. 7 & 23, 2012). We dispense with oral [361]*361argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
512 F. App'x 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turnage-v-lacorte-ca4-2013.