Turman v. Winecoff

75 S.E. 1131, 138 Ga. 726, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 670
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 25, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 75 S.E. 1131 (Turman v. Winecoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turman v. Winecoff, 75 S.E. 1131, 138 Ga. 726, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 670 (Ga. 1912).

Opinion

Fish, C. J.

1. In order that a power to sell may survive the death of the grantor, it must be coupled with an interest; and that interest must be not in the proceeds alone of the thing to be sold, but in the thing itself. Civil Code, § 3575, par. 1; Lathrop v. Brown, 65 Ga. 315; Wilkins v. McGehee, 86 Ga. 764 (13 S. E. 84). Such power will not survive merely because the donee may have paid a valuable consideration for it. Coney v. Sanders, 28 Ga. 511.

2. Applying the rule above announced to the contract upon which the petition for intervention in the present case was based, and to the allegations of such petition, the general demurrer to the petition was properly sustained. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justies eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gurr v. Gurr
32 S.E.2d 507 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Finn v. Dobbs
4 S.E.2d 655 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 S.E. 1131, 138 Ga. 726, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turman-v-winecoff-ga-1912.