Turman v. Winecoff

75 S.E. 1131, 138 Ga. 726, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 670
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 25, 1912·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Fish, C. J.

1. In order that a power to sell may survive the death of the grantor, it must be coupled with an interest; and that interest must be not in the proceeds alone of the thing to be sold, but in the thing itself. Civil Code, § 3575, par. 1; Lathrop v. Brown, 65 Ga. 315; Wilkins v. McGehee, 86 Ga. 764 (13 S. E. 84). Such power will not survive merely because the donee may have paid a valuable consideration for it. Coney v. Sanders, 28 Ga. 511.

2. Applying the rule above announced to the contract upon which the petition for intervention in the present case was based, and to the allegations of such petition, the general demurrer to the petition was properly sustained. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justies eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turman v. Winecoff, 75 S.E. 1131, 138 Ga. 726, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 670 (Ga. 1912).

75 S.E. 1131 (Turman v. Winecoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gurr v. Gurr
32 S.E.2d 507 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Finn v. Dobbs
4 S.E.2d 655 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)