TURLEY, ANDREW JAMES v. the State of Texas
This text of TURLEY, ANDREW JAMES v. the State of Texas (TURLEY, ANDREW JAMES v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
NOS. PD-0262-20 & PD-0263-20
ANDREW JAMES TURLEY, Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HARRIS COUNTY
NEWELL, J., filed a concurring opinion in which WALKER J., joined.
As detailed by the Court, the facts of this case are horrible.
Appellant put an advertisement on Craigslist to solicit someone to “Play
with Daddy’s Little Girl,” a thinly veiled invitation for sexual predation
on a small child. Fortunately, law enforcement answered the ad and Turley Concurring — 2
rescued Appellant’s four-year-old daughter who had been drugged with
a sleep aid.
The State charged Appellant with the offense of compelling child
prostitution, a first-degree felony, and human trafficking based upon the
predicate offense of compelling child prostitution, also a first-degree
felony. 1 As the Court explains, the offense of compelling child
prostitution requires some showing that the child engaged in
prostitution, and, by extension, so does the offense of human trafficking
based upon compelled prostitution. I agree with the Court that there
was no evidence presented that the child in this case engaged in
prostitution despite Appellant’s efforts.
At the time the State prosecuted Appellant, the offense of
compelling prostitution was the only first-degree felony prostitution
offense that could arguably apply to what Appellant attempted to do in
this case. At that time, the crime of promotion of prostitution involving
a child was only a second-degree felony. 2 The legislature made that
1 Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 43.05(a)(2) & 20A.02(a)(7).
2 Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 43.03(b)(2) (2015) (“[promotion of prostitution] is a felony of the second degree if the actor engages in conduct . . . involving a person younger than 18 years of age engage in prostitution”); amended by Act of May 28, 2019, 86th Leg., R.S. ch. 273, Tex. Gen. Laws 461, 462 (making the offense of a promotion of prostitution a felony of the first degree if the conduct involves a person younger than 18 years of age). Turley Concurring — 3
offense a first-degree felony in 2019. 3 The offense of promotion of
prostitution involving a child does not require proof that the child
actually engaged in prostitution in order for the person promoting the
child prostitution to be convicted of the first-degree felony offense. 4
Going forward, prosecutors may be able to rely upon this offense as a
possible charge to secure a first-degree felony conviction when faced
with facts similar to those presented here even though the prosecutors
in this case could not.
However, the offense of trafficking of persons for child prostitution
is potentially more problematic. While the statute allows for a first-
degree felony conviction for human trafficking of a child based upon the
predicate offenses of promotion of prostitution and compelling
prostitution, the operative text of that statute arguably requires a
showing that the child engaged in the forbidden conduct. 5 Under
Section 20A.02(a)(7), a person commits the offense of human
trafficking if he “by any means causes the trafficked child or disabled
3 Id.
4 Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 43.03(a)(2) (“A person commits an offense if, acting other than as a prostitute receiving compensation for personally rendered prostitution services, he or she knowingly . . . solicits another to engage in sexual conduct with another person for compensation”).
5 Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 20A.02(b)(1). Turley Concurring — 4
individual to engage in, or become the victim of” the listed predicate
offenses. 6 One possible reading of the statutory requirement that the
child “engage in” particular conduct could be that the State would be
required to show that the child was the actor who promoted or
compelled the prostitution. And it could be argued that the use of the
phrase “become the victim of” requires a showing of a completed offense
of prostitution even under the offense of promotion of prostitution. At
the very least, the question of whether a child victim can be a victim of
promoting prostitution without engaging in sexual conduct is one that
would need to be addressed in the future. I defer to the Legislature on
whether this construction of the statute warrants amendment.
With these thoughts I join the Court’s opinion.
Filed: June 26, 2024
Publish
6 Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 20A.02(a)(7).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
TURLEY, ANDREW JAMES v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turley-andrew-james-v-the-state-of-texas-texcrimapp-2024.