TURLEY, ANDREW JAMES v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 26, 2024
DocketPD-0262-20
StatusPublished

This text of TURLEY, ANDREW JAMES v. the State of Texas (TURLEY, ANDREW JAMES v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
TURLEY, ANDREW JAMES v. the State of Texas, (Tex. 2024).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

NOS. PD-0262-20 & PD-0263-20

ANDREW JAMES TURLEY, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HARRIS COUNTY

NEWELL, J., filed a concurring opinion in which WALKER J., joined.

As detailed by the Court, the facts of this case are horrible.

Appellant put an advertisement on Craigslist to solicit someone to “Play

with Daddy’s Little Girl,” a thinly veiled invitation for sexual predation

on a small child. Fortunately, law enforcement answered the ad and Turley Concurring — 2

rescued Appellant’s four-year-old daughter who had been drugged with

a sleep aid.

The State charged Appellant with the offense of compelling child

prostitution, a first-degree felony, and human trafficking based upon the

predicate offense of compelling child prostitution, also a first-degree

felony. 1 As the Court explains, the offense of compelling child

prostitution requires some showing that the child engaged in

prostitution, and, by extension, so does the offense of human trafficking

based upon compelled prostitution. I agree with the Court that there

was no evidence presented that the child in this case engaged in

prostitution despite Appellant’s efforts.

At the time the State prosecuted Appellant, the offense of

compelling prostitution was the only first-degree felony prostitution

offense that could arguably apply to what Appellant attempted to do in

this case. At that time, the crime of promotion of prostitution involving

a child was only a second-degree felony. 2 The legislature made that

1 Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 43.05(a)(2) & 20A.02(a)(7).

2 Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 43.03(b)(2) (2015) (“[promotion of prostitution] is a felony of the second degree if the actor engages in conduct . . . involving a person younger than 18 years of age engage in prostitution”); amended by Act of May 28, 2019, 86th Leg., R.S. ch. 273, Tex. Gen. Laws 461, 462 (making the offense of a promotion of prostitution a felony of the first degree if the conduct involves a person younger than 18 years of age). Turley Concurring — 3

offense a first-degree felony in 2019. 3 The offense of promotion of

prostitution involving a child does not require proof that the child

actually engaged in prostitution in order for the person promoting the

child prostitution to be convicted of the first-degree felony offense. 4

Going forward, prosecutors may be able to rely upon this offense as a

possible charge to secure a first-degree felony conviction when faced

with facts similar to those presented here even though the prosecutors

in this case could not.

However, the offense of trafficking of persons for child prostitution

is potentially more problematic. While the statute allows for a first-

degree felony conviction for human trafficking of a child based upon the

predicate offenses of promotion of prostitution and compelling

prostitution, the operative text of that statute arguably requires a

showing that the child engaged in the forbidden conduct. 5 Under

Section 20A.02(a)(7), a person commits the offense of human

trafficking if he “by any means causes the trafficked child or disabled

3 Id.

4 Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 43.03(a)(2) (“A person commits an offense if, acting other than as a prostitute receiving compensation for personally rendered prostitution services, he or she knowingly . . . solicits another to engage in sexual conduct with another person for compensation”).

5 Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 20A.02(b)(1). Turley Concurring — 4

individual to engage in, or become the victim of” the listed predicate

offenses. 6 One possible reading of the statutory requirement that the

child “engage in” particular conduct could be that the State would be

required to show that the child was the actor who promoted or

compelled the prostitution. And it could be argued that the use of the

phrase “become the victim of” requires a showing of a completed offense

of prostitution even under the offense of promotion of prostitution. At

the very least, the question of whether a child victim can be a victim of

promoting prostitution without engaging in sexual conduct is one that

would need to be addressed in the future. I defer to the Legislature on

whether this construction of the statute warrants amendment.

With these thoughts I join the Court’s opinion.

Filed: June 26, 2024

Publish

6 Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 20A.02(a)(7).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 20A.02
Texas PE § 20A.02(b)(1)
§ 43.03
Texas PE § 43.03(b)(2)
§ 43.05
Texas PE § 43.05(a)(2)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
TURLEY, ANDREW JAMES v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turley-andrew-james-v-the-state-of-texas-texcrimapp-2024.