Turkupolis v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedJune 24, 2014
Docket1:10-vv-00351
StatusPublished

This text of Turkupolis v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Turkupolis v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turkupolis v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2014).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 10-351V May 30, 2014 To be Published

*************************************** MADISON TURKUPOLIS, * * Petitioner, * * v. * HPV vaccine (Gardasil); * neurocardiogenic syncope; SECRETARY OF HEALTH * basilar migraine AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * *************************************** Ronald C. Homer, Boston, MA, for petitioner. Voris E. Johnson, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION1

On June 7, 2010, Jill Turkupolis filed a petition under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa–10-34 (2006), alleging that the second administration of human papillomavirus vaccine (“Gardasil”) on September 10, 2007, caused her daughter Madison unspecified neurological injuries. On November 4, 2010, petitioner filed an amended petition alleging unspecified neurological injuries with detailed descriptions of the contents of medical records.

Madison was a minor at the time her mother filed the petition and amended petition. Madison reached her majority on December 2, 2012. On December 3, 2012, petitioner moved to

1 Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact such information prior to the document’s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within the categories listed above, the special master shall redact such material from public access. amend the caption to reflect that Madison was now the petitioner in this case. By an Order dated December 4, 2013, former Special Master Daria J. Zane, who presided over this case, granted petitioner’s motion.

Special Master Zane held a hearing in this case on April 24, 2012 (followed by a transcript filed on May 30, 2012) and December 13, 2012 (followed by a transcript filed on January 15, 2013). Dr. Svetlana Blitshteyn testified for petitioner. Dr. John MacDonald testified for respondent. Both are neurologists.

On May 24, 2013, the parties filed simultaneous post-hearing briefs. On August 2, 2013, the parties filed simultaneous responsive briefs. At the end of August, Special Master Zane retired.

On September 23, 2013, this case was transferred to the undersigned.

On October 24, 2013, petitioner moved for leave to file newly discovered evidence consisting of Exhibit 47, an article petitioner’s expert Dr. Blitshteyn wrote on postural tachycardia syndrome (“POTS”) following human papillomavirus vaccination, which petitioner also filed on October 24, 2013. Ex. 47. Respondent did not respond to petitioner’s motion. On November 14, 2013, the undersigned granted petitioner’s motion for leave to file.

On November 21, 2013, the undersigned held a telephonic status conference to discuss the undersigned’s view of the case and to inquire if the parties were willing to engage in settlement negotiations. The undersigned offered the parties the opportunity to have a new hearing since they now had a new special master presiding over the case. The parties declined the offer to have a new hearing.

On December 4, 2013, the undersigned held a telephonic status conference in which the parties expressed the unlikelihood of settlement. The undersigned ordered petitioner’s expert Dr. Blitshteyn to answer eight questions in a supplemental report due December 18, 2013.

On January 17, 2014, petitioner filed a status report stating settlement was not feasible.

After three extensions of time, on April 4, 2014, petitioner filed the supplemental expert report of Dr. Blitshteyn as Exhibit 48. The case is now ready for decision.

FACTS

Madison was born on December 2, 1994.

On June 23, 2006, Madison’s blood pressure was 138/70. Med. recs. Ex. 1, at 2. She was going to travel to Latvia. Id.

2 On June 28, 2006, Madison’s mother called her pediatrician’s office. Id. at 3. She reported that Madison’s blood pressure was checked at her grandmother’s house on June 25, 2006, and she had a systolic blood pressure of 117 and an unknown diastolic blood pressure. Id. Madison’s pediatrician advised her mother to have Madison visit the pediatrician or call the pediatrician with a specific, accurate blood pressure reading prior to Madison’s departure to Latvia on June 30, 2006. Id. The pediatrician would recheck Madison’s blood pressure when she returned from her trip to Latvia. Id.

On June 29, 2006, Madison’s mother phoned the pediatrician to say that Madison’s blood pressure readings that day were 121/60 with a pulse of 75, and 112/56 with a pulse of 75. Id.

On April 30, 2007, Madison’s father called the pediatrician to say that Madison fell over a fence on April 29 and hit the top of her head. Id. at 4. She did not vomit, but she was lightheaded and dizzy. Id. She had nausea and headache and went to the emergency room at St. Vincent’s Children’s Hospital. Id. Her chief complaint was head injury, headache, and nausea. Med. recs. Ex. 23, at 126. She had no recall of the events. Id.

On May 3, 2007, Madison’s headache persisted without relief. Med. recs. Ex. 1, at 4. She had had it for four weeks, and it was more intense now. Id. She was seen in the emergency room, where she had a negative CT scan of her head except for extensive sinus inflammation. Id. She was prescribed Augmentin.2 Id.

On July 2, 2007, Madison received her first human papillomavirus vaccination. Id. at 4.

On September 10, 2007, Madison received her second human papillomavirus vaccination. Id.

On September 16, 2007, Madison had a CT scan of her brain because of loss of consciousness, neck pain, and headache. Id. at 28. The CT scan was negative. Id.

On September 18, 2007, Madison saw Dr. Leonard A. Steinberg, a cardiologist. Her blood pressure was 125/84. Id. at 21. Dr. Steinberg diagnosed Madison with peri-exertional syncope (fainting from exertion). Id. at 22.

On September 19, 2007, Fishers Emergency Medical Services treated Madison for general weakness, loss of consciousness, palpitations, and syncope. Med. recs. Ex. 16, at 1, 3. Her blood pressure was 135/83. Id. at 3.

2 Augmentin is “trademark for combination preparations of amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium.” Dorland’s Illustrated Medical Dictionary 179 (32d ed. 2012) [hereinafter Dorland’s]. Amoxicillin is an antibiotic. Id. at 65. Clavulanate potassium treats infections. Id. at 370. 3 On October 4, 2007, Madison’s mother phoned the pediatrician, saying Madison’s ECHO, EKG, treadmill exercise test, and cardiac MRI were normal. Med. recs. Ex. 1, at 5. Madison had had some dizziness, but she was not passing out. Id. The pediatrician recommended no further sports until he cleared her. Id. He noted that Madison may have some kind of vasovagal3 problem. Id.

On October 12, 2007, Madison saw Dr. Steinberg, complaining of exertional syncope and dizziness. Id. at 19. Her blood pressure was 136/80. Id. Dr. Steinberg concluded Madison did not have cardiac problems. Id. at 20. He diagnosed Madison with exertional syncope and dizziness. Id. at 19.

On October 23, 2007, Madison saw Dr. David Harsha, complaining of shortness of breath beginning within the first five or ten minutes of exercise. Med. recs. Ex. 21, at 1. Symptoms could become severe to the point of her almost collapsing, especially at the end of her cross- country race. Id.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Turkupolis v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turkupolis-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-service-uscfc-2014.