Turksoy v. Acar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Turksoy v. Acar

5 A.D.3d 589, 772 N.Y.S.2d 831

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.3d 589 (Turksoy v. Acar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turksoy v. Acar, 5 A.D.3d 589, 772 N.Y.S.2d 831 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action pursuant to CPLR article 53 to enforce a judgment of a foreign country, brought by motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kitson, J.), dated October 31, 2002, which denied his motion for summary judgment and granted the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 327.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss this action on the ground of forum non conveniens (see Islamic Republic of [590]*590Iran v Pahlavi, 62 NY2d 474 [1984], cert denied 469 US 1108 [1985]; Halberthal v Halberthal, 263 AD2d 465 [1999]).

In light of the foregoing, we pass upon no other issue. Altman, J.P., Smith, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action pursuant to CPLR article 53 to enforce a judgment of a foreign country, brought by motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kitson, J.), dated October 31, 2002, which denied his motion for summary judgment and granted the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 327.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss this action on the ground of forum non conveniens (see Islamic Republic of [590]*590Iran v Pahlavi, 62 NY2d 474 [1984], cert denied 469 US 1108 [1985]; Halberthal v Halberthal, 263 AD2d 465 [1999]).

In light of the foregoing, we pass upon no other issue. Altman, J.P., Smith, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.3d 589, 772 N.Y.S.2d 831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turksoy-v-acar-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack