Turkel v. Kiamesha Lake Hotel Corp.
This text of 230 A.D. 800 (Turkel v. Kiamesha Lake Hotel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the question proposed presented an issue which under the circumstances ought to be submitted to the jury. Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouek, JJ., concur; Van Kirk, P. J., and Davis, J., dissent on the ground that the order was in the discretion of the court, and no sufficient ground is shown for reversal; that no question of fact at issue has been decided; and all questions should be left for trial before the court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 A.D. 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turkel-v-kiamesha-lake-hotel-corp-nyappdiv-1930.