Turke v. Lime Realty Corp.

342 So. 2d 1068, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15376
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 1, 1977
DocketNo. 76-420
StatusPublished

This text of 342 So. 2d 1068 (Turke v. Lime Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turke v. Lime Realty Corp., 342 So. 2d 1068, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15376 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendants appeal from a final judgment based on a jury verdict in an action for breach of contract to manage a lime grove. The single question presented on appeal is whether the plaintiff’s evidence of loss caused by the improper management was too speculative to warrant recovery. Our review of the record convinces us that the proof was adequate under the rule stated in Hodges v. Fries, 34 Fla. 63, 15 So. 682 (1894); and Conner v. Atlas Aircraft Corporation, 310 So.2d 352, 354 (Fla.3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Conner v. Atlas Aircraft Corporation
310 So. 2d 352 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Hodges v. A. P. Fries & Co.
34 Fla. 63 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
342 So. 2d 1068, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turke-v-lime-realty-corp-fladistctapp-1977.