Turke v. Lime Realty Corp.
342 So. 2d 1068, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15376
Opinion
The defendants appeal from a final judgment based on a jury verdict in an action for breach of contract to manage a lime grove. The single question presented on appeal is whether the plaintiff’s evidence of loss caused by the improper management was too speculative to warrant recovery. Our review of the record convinces us that the proof was adequate under the rule stated in Hodges v. Fries, 34 Fla. 63, 15 So. 682 (1894); and Conner v. Atlas Aircraft Corporation, 310 So.2d 352, 354 (Fla.3d DCA 1975).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Turke v. Lime Realty Corp., 342 So. 2d 1068, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15376 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).
342 So. 2d 1068 (Turke v. Lime Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Conner v. Atlas Aircraft Corporation
310 So. 2d 352 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Hodges v. A. P. Fries & Co.
34 Fla. 63 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1894)