Turk v. Ross
This text of 59 Ga. 378 (Turk v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The priority of debts is established by Code, §2533. This [380]*380is not to be altered by subsequent judgments. 45 Ga., 205. Creditors can contest priority after judgment as well' as before. This being so, there is no reason for enjoining suits against the executor.
Cited by plaintiffs in error: 1 Chit. Pl. 1; Code, §3451; 55 Ga., 36; Colesby vs. Dart, 59 Ga.; 8 Ib., 236; 10 Ib., 266; 25 Ib., 152; Code, §2542; 41 Ga., 307; Hayden vs. Johnson, 59 Ib.; Acts of 1869, p. 134; 45 Ga., 478; 57 Ib., 459; Code, §§2922, 2926; 46 Ga., 361; 48 Ib., 150, 471; 57 Ib., 227; 41 Ib., 579; Brandon vs. Low, 59 Ib.; Johnson vs. McCullough, Ib.; Code, §§1947, 3596, 3317, 3594, 3210, 3081, 3095, 3096, 4178; 22 Ga., 123; 3 Cent. Law J., 785; High on Inj., §§44, 45; 2 Story’s Eq., §875.
Cited by defendants: Code, §3451; 55 Ga., 36; Code, §§3144, 2918, 2607; Adams’ Eq., 258, and note; Story’s Eq. Pl., §99.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 Ga. 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turk-v-ross-ga-1877.