Turk v. Malverne Estates, Inc.

232 A.D. 852

This text of 232 A.D. 852 (Turk v. Malverne Estates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turk v. Malverne Estates, Inc., 232 A.D. 852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Order and judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars [853]*853costs and disbursements, plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment denied, with ten dollars costs, and defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ first and second causes of action granted, with ten dollars costs. Plaintiffs may serve an amended complaint within ten days from the entry of the order herein if they be so advised. The first and second causes of action do not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (Reife v. Osmers, 252 N. Y. 320.) The denials of the third cause of action and the defense thereto are sufficient. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Seudder, J., dissents as to the determination in connection with the third cause of action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reife v. Osmers
169 N.E. 399 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 A.D. 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turk-v-malverne-estates-inc-nyappdiv-1931.