Turi v. Stacey

Eleventh Circuit

Turi v. Stacey

627 F. App'x 904

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedDecember 16, 2015

DocketNo. 15-10823

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 627 F. App'x 904 (Turi v. Stacey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turi v. Stacey, 627 F. App'x 904 (11th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff John J; Turi, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims against foreign defendants for lack of personal jurisdiction. After careful review of the briefs and the record,, we find no error and affirm based on the magistrate judge’s well-reasoned November 25, 2014 report and recommendation, which the district court adopted in its January 28,2015 order.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff John J; Turi, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims against foreign defendants for lack of personal jurisdiction. After careful review of the briefs and the record,, we find no error and affirm based on the magistrate judge’s well-reasoned November 25, 2014 report and recommendation, which the district court adopted in its January 28,2015 order.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

627 F. App'x 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turi-v-stacey-ca11-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack