Turi v. Stacey

Eleventh Circuit

Turi v. Stacey

627 F. App'x 904

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 16, 2015·No. No. 15-10823·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff John J; Turi, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims against foreign defendants for lack of personal jurisdiction. After careful review of the briefs and the record,, we find no error and affirm based on the magistrate judge’s well-reasoned November 25, 2014 report and recommendation, which the district court adopted in its January 28,2015 order.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff John J; Turi, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims against foreign defendants for lack of personal jurisdiction. After careful review of the briefs and the record,, we find no error and affirm based on the magistrate judge’s well-reasoned November 25, 2014 report and recommendation, which the district court adopted in its January 28,2015 order.

AFFIRMED.

Turi v. Stacey, 627 F. App'x 904 (11th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

627 F. App'x 904 (Turi v. Stacey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related