Turgeon v. Cote

33 A. 787, 88 Me. 108, 1895 Me. LEXIS 118
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJune 3, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 33 A. 787 (Turgeon v. Cote) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turgeon v. Cote, 33 A. 787, 88 Me. 108, 1895 Me. LEXIS 118 (Me. 1895).

Opinion

Peters, C. J.

The account annexed to the writ, which as a part of the plaintiff’s declaration is demurred to by the defendant, is as follows: "For balance due on account,— for labor performed and materials furnished, as contractor for wood work for the erection and construction of the above building as per agreement,— $725.00.”

On this balance of account are credited several items of cash, leaving a final balance of account of $260.00. The building alluded to is one attached on the writ, and on which it is averred, a lien-claim for the amount of the account exists.

It is not alleged what the price of the work contracted for was, nor does it in any way appear what any or all of the items are constituting the balance due on account of $725.00. The defendant is entitled to know what these particulars are before he can be required to determine whether he will admit or contest the claim. Had the balance been declai’ed upon as a sum duo-on an account stated it might have been different. An account is a detailed statement of items of debt and credit or of debt arising out of contracts between parties. The phrase "a balance due on account” discloses no items, Bennett v. Davis, 62 Maine, 544.

Demurrer sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bramco Electric Corp. v. Shell
230 S.E.2d 576 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1976)
Mugerdichian v. Goudalion
186 A. 611 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1936)
Baxter v. Macgowan
167 A. 77 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1933)
Fitzpatrick v. Rogan
203 P. 245 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1922)
Kneisley Lumber Co. v. Edward B. Stoddard Co.
88 S.W. 774 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 A. 787, 88 Me. 108, 1895 Me. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turgeon-v-cote-me-1895.