Turentine v. Murphey

5 N.C. 180
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJuly 15, 1808
StatusPublished

This text of 5 N.C. 180 (Turentine v. Murphey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turentine v. Murphey, 5 N.C. 180 (N.C. 1808).

Opinion

By the Court

We are pot aw'are of any law by which $he defendant in this instance is liable to pay for the main» tenance of a prisoner committed on a writ of capias ad sa-iisfactepdumi The act of 1773, cli. 4. sec. 9, relied upon for the plaintiff, seems alone to contemplate a case where the party at whose instance the pr isoner is confined, thinks proper to discharge him atid he should prove unable to pay Ibis fees. But as this case states the prisoner to be fully able to pay his fees, and that he has never been discharged Thy defendant, the court can perceive no ground on which the «Meadagí saa be made liable te the plaintiff's desgaaf»

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 N.C. 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turentine-v-murphey-nc-1808.