Turel v. Milberg

10 Misc. 2d 141, 169 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2264
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided October 31, 1957·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff was playing golf at the Elmwood Country Club in a foursome with defendant and two others and was struck by a golf ball hit by defendant. Defendant’s liability is predicated on his failure to shout ‘" fore ” before hitting the golf ball. Plaintiff assumed the risk inherent in playing golf. Well [142]*142aware of this he testified ‘ ‘ no one can tell with certainty when he hits a hall where it is going ’ Since plaintiff himself saw defendant “ about to swing” and actually saw him take the swing, defendant’s shouting fore ” could have made no difference.

The judgment should be reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Hofstadter, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turel v. Milberg, 10 Misc. 2d 141, 169 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2264 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

10 Misc. 2d 141 (Turel v. Milberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Defonce v. K.S.B. Arrowwood Realty Corp.
207 A.D.2d 427 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Wood v. Postelthwaite
496 P.2d 988 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1972)
Nussbaum v. Lacopo
265 N.E.2d 762 (New York Court of Appeals, 1970)
Murphy v. Podgurski
236 So. 2d 508 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1970)