Turel v. Milberg
This text of 10 Misc. 2d 141 (Turel v. Milberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff was playing golf at the Elmwood Country Club in a foursome with defendant and two others and was struck by a golf ball hit by defendant. Defendant’s liability is predicated on his failure to shout ‘" fore ” before hitting the golf ball. Plaintiff assumed the risk inherent in playing golf. Well [142]*142aware of this he testified ‘ ‘ no one can tell with certainty when he hits a hall where it is going ’ Since plaintiff himself saw defendant “ about to swing” and actually saw him take the swing, defendant’s shouting “ fore ” could have made no difference.
The judgment should be reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.
Hofstadter, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Misc. 2d 141, 169 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turel-v-milberg-nyappterm-1957.