Turck v. Gibson
This text of Turck v. Gibson (Turck v. Gibson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
RAYMOND C. TURCK, Claimant-Appellant,
v.
SLOAN D. GIBSON, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee. ______________________
2014-7028 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 12-1174, Judge Mary J. Schoelen. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MAXWELL D. KINMAN, Alexander Webb & Kinman, of Mason, Ohio, argued for claimant-appellant.
WILLIAM J. GRIMALDI, Attorney, Commercial Litiga- tion Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent- appellee. With him on the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Assistant Attorney General, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., Director, and SCOTT D. AUSTIN, Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief were DAVID J. BARRANS, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and MEGHAN D. ALPHONSO, Attorney, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and DYK, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
June 20, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Turck v. Gibson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turck-v-gibson-cafc-2014.