Turchuk v. Town of Wallkill

255 A.D.2d 576, 681 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12889
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 30, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 255 A.D.2d 576 (Turchuk v. Town of Wallkill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turchuk v. Town of Wallkill, 255 A.D.2d 576, 681 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Murphy, J.), dated December 5, 1997, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of its motion for summary judgment, the defendant submitted a report from a physician who examined the plaintiff and found that although the plaintiff had sustained a contusion to the right shoulder, she no longer showed any objective signs of pathology. The defendant therefore demonstrated prima facie entitlement to summary judgment (see, Licari v Elliott, 57 NY2d 230, 239; Stallone v County of Suffolk, 209 AD2d 403; Pagano v Kingsbury, 182 AD2d 268, 271; Forte v Vaccaro, 175 AD2d 153).

In opposition, the plaintiff asserted that she could not perform her daily activities for six months after the accident. The plaintiffs self-serving statements concerning her inability to perform household chores for six months after the accident, without more, were insufficient to show that she had sustained a medically-determined injury or impairment of a nonpermanent nature which prevented her from performing substantially all of the material acts which constituted her usual and customary daily activities for a period of not less than 90 days during the 180-day period immediately following the accident (see, Yagliyan v Gun Shik Yang, 241 AD2d 518; Atamian v Mintz, 216 AD2d 430; Zelenak v Clark, 170 AD2d 677; Phillips v Costa, 160 AD2d 855). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ersop v. Variano
307 A.D.2d 951 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Delgado v. Hakim
287 A.D.2d 592 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Gjelaj v. Ludde
281 A.D.2d 211 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Beltran v. Sen Shi
276 A.D.2d 656 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Merlo v. Pupke
276 A.D.2d 604 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Slasor v. Elfaiz
275 A.D.2d 771 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Grossman v. Wright
268 A.D.2d 79 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 A.D.2d 576, 681 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turchuk-v-town-of-wallkill-nyappdiv-1998.