Turchon v. Compu-Marketing Concepts, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Turchon v. Compu-Marketing Concepts, Inc.

106 A.D.2d 393, 482 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21422

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 3, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 106 A.D.2d 393 (Turchon v. Compu-Marketing Concepts, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turchon v. Compu-Marketing Concepts, Inc., 106 A.D.2d 393, 482 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21422 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to section 619 of the Business Corporation Law to set aside an election of the respondent directors of respondent corporation on the ground that the common voting stock issued to the individual respondents was not issued for consideration and is watered stock, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Spatt, J.), entered August 24, [394]*3941983, which, inter alia, confirmed the report of the referee and dismissed the petition.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

The findings of the referee are supported by the evidence produced at the referee’s hearings as well as at the hearings conducted by Special Term. Thompson, J. P., O’Connor, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to section 619 of the Business Corporation Law to set aside an election of the respondent directors of respondent corporation on the ground that the common voting stock issued to the individual respondents was not issued for consideration and is watered stock, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Spatt, J.), entered August 24, [394]*3941983, which, inter alia, confirmed the report of the referee and dismissed the petition.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

The findings of the referee are supported by the evidence produced at the referee’s hearings as well as at the hearings conducted by Special Term. Thompson, J. P., O’Connor, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 A.D.2d 393, 482 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turchon-v-compu-marketing-concepts-inc-nyappdiv-1984.