Turchin v. Warton
This text of 260 A.D. 447 (Turchin v. Warton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion should have been granted, for the reasons that the chattel when mortgaged was situated in the city of New York, and the mortgagor was a resident of Westchester county, State of New York. Therefore, the mortgage should have been filed in the county of Westchester as well as in the county where the chattel was located. (See Lien Law, §§ 230 and 232.)
The order appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.
Present — ■ Martin, P. J., OMalley, Townley, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
260 A.D. 447, 23 N.Y.S.2d 144, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turchin-v-warton-nyappdiv-1940.