Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Turben v. State

Turben v. State

884 So. 2d 1157, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 16081, 2004 WL 2402464
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 28, 2004
DocketNo. 1D02-5192
StatusPublished

This text of 884 So. 2d 1157 (Turben v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turben v. State, 884 So. 2d 1157, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 16081, 2004 WL 2402464 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinions

BARFIELD, J.

In this appeal Candy Ann Turben contends she was set up by the prosecutor to answer a question in such a manner as to allow the introduction of evidence not otherwise admissible against her. She asserts that the question asked, when considered in the context of the interrogation on cross examination, should have been viewed differently by the trial judge. This was a discretionary call with which we will not interfere.

AFFIRMED.

POLSTON, J., Concurs; ERVIN, J., Dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fiddemon v. State
858 So. 2d 1100 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Bozeman v. State
698 So. 2d 629 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
McCoy v. State
853 So. 2d 396 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Castro v. State
547 So. 2d 111 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Winner v. Sharp
43 So. 2d 634 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
884 So. 2d 1157, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 16081, 2004 WL 2402464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turben-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.