Tupperware Company, a Division of Dart Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Sixth Circuit

Tupperware Company, a Division of Dart Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

477 F.2d 126, 83 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2846, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10478

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 17, 1973

Docket72-1784

StatusPublished

This text of 477 F.2d 126 (Tupperware Company, a Division of Dart Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tupperware Company, a Division of Dart Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 477 F.2d 126, 83 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2846, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10478 (6th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This case is before this Court upon the petition of Tupperware Company for review of an order entered by the National Labor Relations Board finding it guilty of violating Section 8(a)(3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, by discharging its employee Wade Richardson because of his union activities.

The Board requests the court to deny the petition for review and to enter an order of enforcement of its order. The sole question before the court is whether there is substantial evidence in the record as a whole to support the finding of the Board that the employee was discharged because of his union activities. Having fully examined the record, we are of the opinion that the Board’s order is supported by substantial evidence.

The petition of the company for review will therefore be denied and the Board’s order against the company finding it guilty of violating the Act will be enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This case is before this Court upon the petition of Tupperware Company for review of an order entered by the National Labor Relations Board finding it guilty of violating Section 8(a)(3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, by discharging its employee Wade Richardson because of his union activities.

The Board requests the court to deny the petition for review and to enter an order of enforcement of its order. The sole question before the court is whether there is substantial evidence in the record as a whole to support the finding of the Board that the employee was discharged because of his union activities. Having fully examined the record, we are of the opinion that the Board’s order is supported by substantial evidence.

The petition of the company for review will therefore be denied and the Board’s order against the company finding it guilty of violating the Act will be enforced.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

477 F.2d 126, 83 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2846, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tupperware-company-a-division-of-dart-industries-inc-v-national-labor-ca6-1973.