Tupica v. State

444 So. 2d 572, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11603
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 1, 1984·No. No. 82-2536·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals his conviction of attempted trafficking in cocaine. We find no merit in any of the arguments presented to us and affirm. See Silvestri v. State, 332 So.2d 351 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976), and Nichols v. State, 248 So.2d 199 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971).

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and BERANEK and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tupica v. State, 444 So. 2d 572, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11603 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

444 So. 2d 572 (Tupica v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tupica v. Wainwright
595 F. Supp. 781 (S.D. Florida, 1984)