Tupica v. Macina

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tupica v. Macina

454 So. 2d 682, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1687, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14012

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 1, 1984

DocketNo. 83-2622

StatusPublished

This text of 454 So. 2d 682 (Tupica v. Macina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tupica v. Macina, 454 So. 2d 682, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1687, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14012 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record we believe that there is an adequate evidentiary basis to support the trial court’s judgment can-celling a warranty deed executed by the appellee in favor of the appellants. We also reject appellants’ claim that the trial court erred in failing to reform the terms of the deed, there having been no claim for reformation made by any of the parties in the trial court.

ANSTEAD, C.J., HURLEY, J., and GREEN, OLIVER L., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record we believe that there is an adequate evidentiary basis to support the trial court’s judgment can-celling a warranty deed executed by the appellee in favor of the appellants. We also reject appellants’ claim that the trial court erred in failing to reform the terms of the deed, there having been no claim for reformation made by any of the parties in the trial court.

ANSTEAD, C.J., HURLEY, J., and GREEN, OLIVER L., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

454 So. 2d 682, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1687, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tupica-v-macina-fladistctapp-1984.