Tuolumne Redemption Co. v. Patterson

California Supreme Court

Tuolumne Redemption Co. v. Patterson

18 Cal. 415, 1861 Cal. LEXIS 217

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1861

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 18 Cal. 415 (Tuolumne Redemption Co. v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tuolumne Redemption Co. v. Patterson, 18 Cal. 415, 1861 Cal. LEXIS 217 (Cal. 1861).

Pincite

Opinion

,Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, C. J. and Baldwin, J. concurring.

The plaintiff was entitled to a judgment upon the complaint; and the Court erred in requiring proof of the facts therein stated. The complaint" was verified, and the failure of the defendant to answer was an admission of the facts charged. No proof was necessary to enable the Court to render the proper judgment.

Judgment reversed and" cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

,Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, C. J. and Baldwin, J. concurring.

The plaintiff was entitled to a judgment upon the complaint; and the Court erred in requiring proof of the facts therein stated. The complaint" was verified, and the failure of the defendant to answer was an admission of the facts charged. No proof was necessary to enable the Court to render the proper judgment.

Judgment reversed and" cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Cal. 415, 1861 Cal. LEXIS 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tuolumne-redemption-co-v-patterson-cal-1861.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack