Tuolumne Cty. Water Co. v. Columbia & Stanislaus Water Co.
10 Cal. 193, 1858 Cal. LEXIS 212
Opinion
Terry, C. J., concurring.
1. The complaint in this case is sufficient.
2. The witness Morrissey had no interest in the event of the suit, having ceased to be a stockholder before the suit was brought.
3. The damages were not excessive.
Judgment affirmed, with ten per cent, damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tuolumne Cty. Water Co. v. Columbia & Stanislaus Water Co., 10 Cal. 193, 1858 Cal. LEXIS 212 (Cal. 1858).
10 Cal. 193 (Tuolumne Cty. Water Co. v. Columbia & Stanislaus Water Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sannoner v. Jacobson & Co.
47 Ark. 31 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1885)