Tuolumne Cty. Water Co. v. Columbia & Stanislaus Water Co.
10 Cal. 193, 1858 Cal. LEXIS 212
This text of 10 Cal. 193 (Tuolumne Cty. Water Co. v. Columbia & Stanislaus Water Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tuolumne Cty. Water Co. v. Columbia & Stanislaus Water Co., 10 Cal. 193, 1858 Cal. LEXIS 212 (Cal. 1858).
Opinion
Terry, C. J., concurring.
1. The complaint in this case is sufficient.
2. The witness Morrissey had no interest in the event of the suit, having ceased to be a stockholder before the suit was brought.
3. The damages were not excessive.
Judgment affirmed, with ten per cent, damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sannoner v. Jacobson & Co.
47 Ark. 31 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1885)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 Cal. 193, 1858 Cal. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tuolumne-cty-water-co-v-columbia-stanislaus-water-co-cal-1858.