Tuolumne Cty. Water Co. v. Columbia & Stanislaus River Water Co.
10 Cal. 395
This text of 10 Cal. 395 (Tuolumne Cty. Water Co. v. Columbia & Stanislaus River Water Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tuolumne Cty. Water Co. v. Columbia & Stanislaus River Water Co., 10 Cal. 395 (Cal. 1858).
Opinion
Field, J., and Baldwin, J., concurring.
It is unnecessary to examine the various errors assigned in the brief of counsel, as the fourth exception is fatal to respondents’ case, under the decision of Drake v. Eakin, at the present term. On the authority of that case, the judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 Cal. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tuolumne-cty-water-co-v-columbia-stanislaus-river-water-co-cal-1858.