Tuohy v. State

776 So. 2d 902, 2000 Ala. LEXIS 284, 2000 WL 869566
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 30, 2000·No. 1982094·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is quashed as having been improvidently granted.

In quashing the writ, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, COOK, SEE, LYONS, and BROWN, JJ., concur. HOUSTON, JOHNSTONE, and ENGLAND, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tuohy v. State, 776 So. 2d 902, 2000 Ala. LEXIS 284, 2000 WL 869566 (Ala. 2000).

776 So. 2d 902 (Tuohy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bailey
49 So. 3d 1245 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2010)
State v. Taylor
46 So. 3d 504 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2010)