Tuohy v. State

776 So. 2d 902, 2000 Ala. LEXIS 284, 2000 WL 869566
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 30, 2000
Docket1982094
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 776 So. 2d 902 (Tuohy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tuohy v. State, 776 So. 2d 902, 2000 Ala. LEXIS 284, 2000 WL 869566 (Ala. 2000).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is quashed as having been improvidently granted.

In quashing the writ, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, COOK, SEE, LYONS, and BROWN, JJ., concur. HOUSTON, JOHNSTONE, and ENGLAND, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Bailey
49 So. 3d 1245 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2010)
State v. Taylor
46 So. 3d 504 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
776 So. 2d 902, 2000 Ala. LEXIS 284, 2000 WL 869566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tuohy-v-state-ala-2000.