Tunstall v. Lumberton Correctional Health Care Provider(s)
771 S.E.2d 286, 368 N.C. 254, 2015 N.C. LEXIS 1317, 2015 WL 1782645
This text of 771 S.E.2d 286 (Tunstall v. Lumberton Correctional Health Care Provider(s)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tunstall v. Lumberton Correctional Health Care Provider(s), 771 S.E.2d 286, 368 N.C. 254, 2015 N.C. LEXIS 1317, 2015 WL 1782645 (N.C. 2015).
Opinion
1. Pit’s Pro Se Motion for NOA (COAP15-156)
1. Dismissed ex mero motu
2. Pit’s Pro Se PWC to Review Order of the COA
2. Denied
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
771 S.E.2d 286, 368 N.C. 254, 2015 N.C. LEXIS 1317, 2015 WL 1782645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tunstall-v-lumberton-correctional-health-care-providers-nc-2015.