Tunstall v. Buller

252 A.D. 847, 300 N.Y.S. 998, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6485

This text of 252 A.D. 847 (Tunstall v. Buller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tunstall v. Buller, 252 A.D. 847, 300 N.Y.S. 998, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6485 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

Decree, so far as appealed from, affirmed. No opinion. (Dore and Callahan, JJ., dissent as to Annie A. Coulson, as executrix, etc., and vote to reverse in so far as her surcharge is concerned.) Settle order on notice. Present —■ Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 A.D. 847, 300 N.Y.S. 998, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tunstall-v-buller-nyappdiv-1937.