Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen

322 U.S. 721, 64 S. Ct. 1258
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 29, 1944
DocketNo. 779
StatusPublished

This text of 322 U.S. 721 (Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, 322 U.S. 721, 64 S. Ct. 1258 (1944).

Opinion

[721]*721Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted.

Messrs. Harold C. Heiss, Russell B. Day, and Wm. G. Maupin for the Brotherhood of Locomotive Eiremen & Enginemen et al., and Mr. Jas. G. Martin for the Norfolk Southern Railway Co., respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
322 U.S. 721, 64 S. Ct. 1258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tunstall-v-brotherhood-of-locomotive-firemen-enginemen-scotus-1944.