Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/TUNSTALL-BEY v. Ballance

TUNSTALL-BEY v. Ballance

721 S.E.2d 228, 365 N.C. 546, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 79, 2012 WL 364853
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 26, 2012
Docket417P11-1
StatusPublished

This text of 721 S.E.2d 228 (TUNSTALL-BEY v. Ballance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
TUNSTALL-BEY v. Ballance, 721 S.E.2d 228, 365 N.C. 546, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 79, 2012 WL 364853 (N.C. 2012).

Opinion

721 S.E.2d 228 (2012)

TUNSTALL-BEY
v.
BALLANCE.

No. 417P11-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2012.

Charles Alonzo Tunstall-Bey, Polkton, for Tunstall-Bey, Charles Alonzo.

Frank W. Ballance, Jr., Representative, Warrenton, for Ballance, Frank W., Jr.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of November 2011 by Petitioner for Reconsideration:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of January 2012."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
721 S.E.2d 228, 365 N.C. 546, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 79, 2012 WL 364853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tunstall-bey-v-ballance-nc-2012.