Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/TUNSTALL-BEY v. Ballance

TUNSTALL-BEY v. Ballance

721 S.E.2d 228, 365 N.C. 546, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 79, 2012 WL 364853
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 26, 2012·No. 417P11-1·Published

Opinion

721 S.E.2d 228 (2012)

TUNSTALL-BEY
v.
BALLANCE.

No. 417P11-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2012.

Charles Alonzo Tunstall-Bey, Polkton, for Tunstall-Bey, Charles Alonzo.

Frank W. Ballance, Jr., Representative, Warrenton, for Ballance, Frank W., Jr.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of November 2011 by Petitioner for Reconsideration:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of January 2012."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TUNSTALL-BEY v. Ballance, 721 S.E.2d 228, 365 N.C. 546, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 79, 2012 WL 364853 (N.C. 2012).

721 S.E.2d 228 (TUNSTALL-BEY v. Ballance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.