Tunsil v. State
822 So. 2d 542, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10312, 2002 WL 1625472
This text of 822 So. 2d 542 (Tunsil v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tunsil v. State, 822 So. 2d 542, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10312, 2002 WL 1625472 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinion
Having reviewed the entire record herein, we conclude that defendant should have been afforded the benefit of counsel at the evidentiary hearing on his motion for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for appointment of the public defender and a new hearing.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
822 So. 2d 542, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10312, 2002 WL 1625472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tunsil-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.