Tunsil v. State
822 So. 2d 542, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10312, 2002 WL 1625472
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tunsil v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 797 So. 2d 651 →
Opinion
Having reviewed the entire record herein, we conclude that defendant should have been afforded the benefit of counsel at the evidentiary hearing on his motion for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for appointment of the public defender and a new hearing.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tunsil v. State, 822 So. 2d 542, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10312, 2002 WL 1625472 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
822 So. 2d 542 (Tunsil v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.