Tunnisia Nelson, et al. v. Daniel Washburn, et al.

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided October 31, 2025·No. 2:25-cv-01024·Unknown

Opinion

2 3 4 5 8 9 Tunnisia Nelson, et al., No. CV-25-01024-PHX-KML 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 Vv. ) Daniel Washburn, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 On September 23, 2025, Magistrate Judge Alison S. Bachus issued a Report and 16 Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending the court dismiss this case in its entirety based on plaintiffs’ failure to serve defendants. (Doc. 29.) No objections were filed, and the R&R 18 1s adopted in full. See Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (‘[D]istrict courts are not required to conduct any review at all . . . of any issue that is not 20 the subject of an objection.”). 1 IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 29) is ADOPTED. The 92 complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court shall enter 93 judgment and close this case. 24 Dated this 30th day of October, 2025. 25

28 United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tunnisia Nelson, et al. v. Daniel Washburn, et al., (D. Ariz. 2025).

Tunnisia Nelson, et al. v. Daniel Washburn, et al. (Tunnisia Nelson, et al. v. Daniel Washburn, et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schmidt v. Johnstone
263 F. Supp. 2d 1219 (D. Arizona, 2003)