Tunnisia Nelson, et al. v. Daniel Washburn, et al.
This text of Tunnisia Nelson, et al. v. Daniel Washburn, et al. (Tunnisia Nelson, et al. v. Daniel Washburn, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Tunnisia Nelson, et al., No. CV-25-01024-PHX-KML 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 Vv. |) Daniel Washburn, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 On September 23, 2025, Magistrate Judge Alison S. Bachus issued a Report and 16 || Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending the court dismiss this case in its entirety based on plaintiffs’ failure to serve defendants. (Doc. 29.) No objections were filed, and the R&R 18 || 1s adopted in full. See Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) || (‘[D]istrict courts are not required to conduct any review at all . . . of any issue that is not 20 || the subject of an objection.”). 1 IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 29) is ADOPTED. The 92 || complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court shall enter 93 || judgment and close this case. 24 Dated this 30th day of October, 2025. 25
28 United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tunnisia Nelson, et al. v. Daniel Washburn, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tunnisia-nelson-et-al-v-daniel-washburn-et-al-azd-2025.