Tunnel IP, LLC v. AAMP of Florida, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida·Decided July 27, 2022·No. 8:22-cv-01009·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION TUNNEL IP LLC, Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 8:22-cv-1009-KKM-JSS AAMP OF FLORIDA, Defendant.

ORDER

Plaintiffs notified the Court that the parties settled this case. (Doc. 13.) Accordingly, the Court orders that this case is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 3.09(b). Within 60 days of this order, the parties may submit a stipulated judgment or move to

reopen the action. See id.; FED. R. CIV. P. 59(e), 60(b). After that 60-day period, dismissal shall be with prejudice. The Court declines to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement

agreement, as the parties have not identified a compelling “factual or legal basis to [do so].” Goldsby v. Renosol Seating, LLC, 294 F.R.D. 649, 654 (S.D. Ala. 2013). The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines and to close this case. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on July 27, 2022.

fatten Kiimlald Muelle athryn’ Kimball Mizelle United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tunnel IP, LLC v. AAMP of Florida, Inc., (M.D. Fla. 2022).

Tunnel IP, LLC v. AAMP of Florida, Inc. (Tunnel IP, LLC v. AAMP of Florida, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goldsby v. Renosol Seating, LLC
294 F.R.D. 649 (S.D. Alabama, 2013)