Tunnel IP, LLC v. AAMP of Florida, Inc.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION TUNNEL IP LLC, Plaintiffs,
v. Case No. 8:22-cv-1009-KKM-JSS AAMP OF FLORIDA, Defendant.
ORDER
Plaintiffs notified the Court that the parties settled this case. (Doc. 13.) Accordingly, the Court orders that this case is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 3.09(b). Within 60 days of this order, the parties may submit a stipulated judgment or move to
reopen the action. See id.; FED. R. CIV. P. 59(e), 60(b). After that 60-day period, dismissal shall be with prejudice. The Court declines to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement
agreement, as the parties have not identified a compelling “factual or legal basis to [do so].” Goldsby v. Renosol Seating, LLC, 294 F.R.D. 649, 654 (S.D. Ala. 2013). The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines and to close this case. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on July 27, 2022.
fatten Kiimlald Muelle athryn’ Kimball Mizelle United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tunnel IP, LLC v. AAMP of Florida, Inc. (Tunnel IP, LLC v. AAMP of Florida, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.