Tunisha Norton v. Samuel C. Sze

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Appellate case name: Tunisha Norton v. Samuel C. Sze

Appellate case numbers: 01-15-00752-CV

Trial court case numbers: 15-CCV-055348

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 1 of Fort Bend County

On August 31, 2015, appellant, Tunisha Norton, proceeding pro se, timely filed a notice of appeal from the county court’s judgment, signed on August 27, 2015, granting appellee, Samuel C. Sze, possession in this forcible detainer case. See TEX. R. APP. P. § 26.1. On September 11, 2015, appellee, via counsel, filed this opposed “Motion to Accelerate and Give Precedence to Appeal and Notice of Appellant’s Failure to Pay Rent” under Rule 40.1.

Here, without citation to any authority, appellee asserts that this appeal should be given precedence “in the interest of justice” because appellant “has failed to properly and fully pay rent during the pendency of her appeal to the county court and now during this appeal.” However, appellee has failed to show how appellant’s alleged failure to pay rent warrants giving this eviction appeal “precedence in the interest of justice.” TEX. R. APP. P. 40.1(c); cf. TEX. PROP. CODE ANN. § 24.007(b) (West Supp. 2014) (noting appeals may be taken in eviction suits, but does not give them precedence); see, e.g., Cathey v. Meyer, 115 S.W.3d 644, 673–74 (Tex. App.—Waco 2003) (Gray, J., dissenting) (noting “cases to which the Court gives precedence ‘in the interest of justice,’ . . . include those involving family relationships, particularly those concerning children.”) (citing TEX. R. APP. P. 40.1(c)), aff’d in part, rev’d in part, 167 S.W.3d 327 (Tex. 2005).

Accordingly, appellee’s motion to accelerate and give precedence is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes 

Date: September 24, 2015