Tunick v. Shaw
10 N.Y.3d 930
This text of 10 N.Y.3d 930 (Tunick v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tunick v. Shaw, 10 N.Y.3d 930 (N.Y. 2008).
Opinion
JEFFREY P. TUNICK, Respondent,
v.
LARRY SHAW et al., Appellants, et al., Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 N.Y.3d 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tunick-v-shaw-ny-2008.