Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Tung Wa Ma v. New York City Transit Authority

Tung Wa Ma v. New York City Transit Authority

88 A.D.3d 871, 931 N.Y.2d 254
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 18, 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 88 A.D.3d 871 (Tung Wa Ma v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tung Wa Ma v. New York City Transit Authority, 88 A.D.3d 871, 931 N.Y.2d 254 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

The Supreme Court properly denied the motion of the defendants New York City Transit Authority, New York City Metropolitan Transportation Authority, MTA Bus Company, and Ernie Lamboy (hereinafter collectively the appellants) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them, as the appellants failed to establish their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The appellants failed to establish that they were free from negligence as a matter of law (see Pollack v Margolin, 84 AD3d 1341, 1342 [2011]; Lopez v Reyes-Flores, 52 AD3d 785, 786 [2008]). Rivera, J.E, Florio, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lopez v. Reyes-Flores
52 A.D.3d 785 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Pollack v. Margolin
84 A.D.3d 1341 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 A.D.3d 871, 931 N.Y.2d 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tung-wa-ma-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-2011.