Tumininu Banwo v. Sandra Edoka Banwo
Opinion
In the
Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
No. 02-25-00615-CV
TUMININU BANWO, Appellant V.
SANDRA EDOKA BANWO, Appellee
On Appeal from the 325th District Court Tarrant County, Texas
Trial Court No. 325-767099-25
Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT Appellant’s brief was due on March 16, 2026. On March 18, 2026, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, on or before March 30, 2026, appellant filed with the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal.
Per Curiam
Delivered: April 16, 2026
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tumininu Banwo v. Sandra Edoka Banwo (Tumininu Banwo v. Sandra Edoka Banwo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.