Tumininu Banwo v. Sandra Edoka Banwo
This text of Tumininu Banwo v. Sandra Edoka Banwo (Tumininu Banwo v. Sandra Edoka Banwo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00615-CV ___________________________
TUMININU BANWO, Appellant
V.
SANDRA EDOKA BANWO, Appellee
On Appeal from the 325th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 325-767099-25
Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
Appellant’s brief was due on March 16, 2026. On March 18, 2026, we notified
appellant that his brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R.
App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution
unless, on or before March 30, 2026, appellant filed with the court an appellant’s brief
and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and
why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We
have received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal.
Per Curiam
Delivered: April 16, 2026
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tumininu Banwo v. Sandra Edoka Banwo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tumininu-banwo-v-sandra-edoka-banwo-txctapp2-2026.